Comparing: SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB vs Samsung KMRX10014M
In this comparison, we analyze two Disks: SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB and Samsung KMRX10014M, using synthetic benchmark tests to evaluate their overall performance. This side-by-side comparison helps users understand which hardware delivers better value, speed, and efficiency based on standardized testing. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading an existing one, this benchmark-driven evaluation offers valuable insights to guide your decision.

SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
Type: | Disks |
---|---|
Model: | Cruzer Blade 32GB |
Capacity: | 32GB |
Interface: | USB 2.0 |

Samsung KMRX10014M
Type: | Disks |
---|---|
Model: | Samsung KMRX10014M |
Capacity: | 32GB |
Interface: | eMMC |
Specification Comparison Table
Specification | SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB | Samsung KMRX10014M |
---|---|---|
Brand | SanDisk | Samsung |
Format | USB FlashDrive | eMMC 5.1 |
Capacity | 32GB | 32GB |
Interface | USB 2.0 | eMMC |
Submission Comparison Table
Benchmark Software | SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB | Samsung KMRX10014M |
---|
About Hardware SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
The SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB is a USB 2.0 flash drive with a minimalist and lightweight design. With a 32GB capacity, it's enough to store a moderate amount of documents, music, photos and videos.
Although its transfer speed is not as fast as USB 3.0, it remains a popular choice due to its reliability and affordable price.
Sunday, 22 May 2022 04:01:08 | Update: 1 month ago
About Hardware Samsung KMRX10014M
OPPO F1s eMMC 5.1 (Samsung KMRX10014M) is a Samsung-made eMMC 5.1 storage chip used in the OPPO F1s smartphone. With eMMC 5.1 technology, this chip has a higher data transfer rate than eMMC 5.0, allowing for a smoother usage experience in opening apps and reading/writing data.
Although its performance is still below that of UFS, eMMC 5.1 remains a reasonably fast, economical option for mid-range smartphones.
Hardware Detail
The device used is OPPO F1s / A59m (possibly Refurbish) with MediaTek MT6750 specifications and 4GB of RAM and 32GB of storage.
This test was conducted after the device was approximately 7 years old, which is likely to have degraded the performance of eMMC.
Friday, 19 November 2021 16:41:45 | Update: 1 month ago