Loading...

Image


Comparing: Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT012-9WS14C vs Samsung KMRX10014M

In this comparison, we analyze two Disks: Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT012-9WS14C and Samsung KMRX10014M, using synthetic benchmark tests to evaluate their overall performance. This side-by-side comparison helps users understand which hardware delivers better value, speed, and efficiency based on standardized testing. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading an existing one, this benchmark-driven evaluation offers valuable insights to guide your decision.

Hardware Image
Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT012-9WS14C
Type:Disks
Model:Seagate ST320LT012-9WS14C
Capacity:320GB
Interface:SATA-II 3Gbps
See benchmark from Seagate ST320LT012-9WS14C
Hardware Image
Samsung KMRX10014M
Type:Disks
Model:Samsung KMRX10014M
Capacity:32GB
Interface:eMMC
See benchmark from Samsung KMRX10014M

Specification Comparison Table

Specification Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT012-9WS14C Samsung KMRX10014M
Brand Seagate Samsung
Format HDD 2.5 eMMC 5.1
Capacity 320GB 32GB
Interface SATA-II 3Gbps eMMC

Submission Comparison Table

Benchmark Software Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT012-9WS14C Samsung KMRX10014M

About Hardware Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT012-9WS14C

The Seagate ST320LT012-9WS14C is a 320GB capacity 2.5-inch HDD designed for laptops and other portable devices. Using a 3Gbps SATA interface, this HDD has a rotation speed of 5400 RPM, which is more power-efficient than HDDs with higher speeds.

It comes with 8MB of cache, providing sufficient performance for everyday use such as document storage, multimedia, and light applications. Despite its limited capacity, this HDD is still a reliable choice for systems that require HDD-based storage.

Wednesday, 26 December 2012 14:27:32 | Update: 1 month ago


About Hardware Samsung KMRX10014M

OPPO F1s eMMC 5.1 (Samsung KMRX10014M) is a Samsung-made eMMC 5.1 storage chip used in the OPPO F1s smartphone. With eMMC 5.1 technology, this chip has a higher data transfer rate than eMMC 5.0, allowing for a smoother usage experience in opening apps and reading/writing data.

Although its performance is still below that of UFS, eMMC 5.1 remains a reasonably fast, economical option for mid-range smartphones.

Hardware Detail

The device used is OPPO F1s / A59m (possibly Refurbish) with MediaTek MT6750 specifications and 4GB of RAM and 32GB of storage.

This test was conducted after the device was approximately 7 years old, which is likely to have degraded the performance of eMMC.

Friday, 19 November 2021 16:41:45 | Update: 1 month ago