Comparing: SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB vs SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC
In this comparison, we analyze two Disks: SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB and SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC, using synthetic benchmark tests to evaluate their overall performance. This side-by-side comparison helps users understand which hardware delivers better value, speed, and efficiency based on standardized testing. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading an existing one, this benchmark-driven evaluation offers valuable insights to guide your decision.
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
| Type: | Disks |
|---|---|
| Model: | Cruzer Blade 16GB |
| Capacity: | 16GB |
| Interface: | USB 2.0 |
SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC
| Type: | Disks |
|---|---|
| Model: | SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC |
| Capacity: | 32GB |
| Interface: | eMMC |
Specification Comparison Table
| Specification | SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB | SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | SanDisk | SK hynix |
| Format | USB FlashDrive | eMMC 5.1 |
| Capacity | 16GB | 32GB |
| Interface | USB 2.0 | eMMC |
Submission Comparison Table
| Benchmark Software | SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB | SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC |
|---|
About Hardware SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB is a smaller capacity variant of the Cruzer Blade series, using a USB 2.0 interface. Suitable for storing document files or as backup storage at an economical price.
With a compact and lightweight design, this flash drive is easy to carry around, although it does have a lower transfer speed compared to USB 3.0.
Wednesday, 05 April 2023 17:18:31 | Update: 1 month ago
About Hardware SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC
SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC is an eMMC-based storage chip, which is used in mobile devices and embedded systems. With NAND Flash technology, the chip is designed to provide a balance between speed, endurance, and low power consumption.
It is commonly used in devices such as entry-level smartphones, tablets, and IoT devices that require high-efficiency internal storage.
Hardware Detail
The device using this hardware is OPPO A5s (CPH1909) with MT6765 specification 3GB RAM 32GB Storage
The test was conducted after the device was approximately 4 years old, perhaps the performance has decreased
Sunday, 08 September 2019 11:02:46 | Update: 1 month ago