Comparing: SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB vs SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC
In this comparison, we analyze two Disks: SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB and SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC, using synthetic benchmark tests to evaluate their overall performance. This side-by-side comparison helps users understand which hardware delivers better value, speed, and efficiency based on standardized testing. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading an existing one, this benchmark-driven evaluation offers valuable insights to guide your decision.

SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
Type: | Disks |
---|---|
Model: | Cruzer Blade 32GB |
Capacity: | 32GB |
Interface: | USB 2.0 |

SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC
Type: | Disks |
---|---|
Model: | SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC |
Capacity: | 32GB |
Interface: | eMMC |
Specification Comparison Table
Specification | SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB | SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC |
---|---|---|
Brand | SanDisk | SK hynix |
Format | USB FlashDrive | eMMC 5.1 |
Capacity | 32GB | 32GB |
Interface | USB 2.0 | eMMC |
Submission Comparison Table
Benchmark Software | SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB | SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC |
---|
About Hardware SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
The SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB is a USB 2.0 flash drive with a minimalist and lightweight design. With a 32GB capacity, it's enough to store a moderate amount of documents, music, photos and videos.
Although its transfer speed is not as fast as USB 3.0, it remains a popular choice due to its reliability and affordable price.
Sunday, 22 May 2022 04:01:08 | Update: 1 month ago
About Hardware SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC
SK hynix H9TQ27ADFTMC is an eMMC-based storage chip, which is used in mobile devices and embedded systems. With NAND Flash technology, the chip is designed to provide a balance between speed, endurance, and low power consumption.
It is commonly used in devices such as entry-level smartphones, tablets, and IoT devices that require high-efficiency internal storage.
Hardware Detail
The device using this hardware is OPPO A5s (CPH1909) with MT6765 specification 3GB RAM 32GB Storage
The test was conducted after the device was approximately 4 years old, perhaps the performance has decreased
Sunday, 08 September 2019 11:02:46 | Update: 1 month ago