Comparing: AMD E1-1200 vs Intel Core i7 720QM
In this comparison, we analyze two Processors: AMD E1-1200 and Intel Core i7 720QM, using synthetic benchmark tests to evaluate their overall performance. This side-by-side comparison helps users understand which hardware delivers better value, speed, and efficiency based on standardized testing. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading an existing one, this benchmark-driven evaluation offers valuable insights to guide your decision.
Specification Comparison Table
| Specification | AMD E1-1200 | Intel Core i7 720QM |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86 |
| Technology | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Clock | 1.4 GHz - - | 1.6 GHz - 2.8 GHz |
| Core/Thread | 2 / 2 | 4 / 8 |
| Segmen | Mobile | Mobile |
Submission Comparison Table
| Benchmark Software | AMD E1-1200 | Intel Core i7 720QM |
|---|---|---|
| 7-Zip |
2599 MIPS |
10448 MIPS |
| Cinebench - 2003 |
292 cb |
1211 cb |
| Cinebench - R11.5 |
0.54 pts |
2.71 pts |
| Cinebench - R11.5 Single Core |
0.28 pts |
0.60 pts |
| Cinebench - R15 |
44 cb |
220 cb |
| Cinebench - R15 Single Core |
23 cb |
57 cb |
| Cinebench - R20 |
79 pts |
527 pts |
| Cinebench - R20 Single Core |
43 pts |
118 pts |
| Cinebench - R23 Multi Core with BenchMate |
204 pts |
1024 pts |
| Cinebench - R23 Single Core with BenchMate |
110 pts |
301 pts |
| Geekbench3 - Multi Core |
1050 points |
4158 points |
| Geekbench3 - Single Core |
575 points |
1078 points |
| Geekbench4 - Multi Core |
1240 points |
4457 points |
| Geekbench4 - Single Core |
737 points |
1420 points |
| Geekbench5 - Multi Core |
255 points |
917 points |
| Geekbench5 - Single Core |
132 points |
282 points |
| GPUPI for CPU - 100M |
11min, 20sec, 588ms |
2min, 22sec, 383ms |
| GPUPI for CPU - 1B |
2h, 35min, 28sec, 985ms |
21min, 33sec, 52ms |
| HWBOT x265 - 1080P |
0.638 FPS |
4.569 FPS |
| PCMark 7 |
1092 marks |
1630 marks |
| PiFast |
1min, 49sec, 900ms |
34sec, 20ms |
| SuperPi - 1M |
55sec, 754ms |
16sec, 52ms |
| SuperPi - 32M with BenchMate |
45min, 5sec, 892ms |
22min, 4sec, 723ms |
| wPrime - 32M |
1min, 8sec, 78ms |
16sec, 279ms |
| wPrime - 1024M |
36min, 6sec, 64ms |
8min, 13sec, 257ms |
| y-cruncher - Pi-25m |
1min, 10sec, 49ms |
12sec, 665ms |
About Hardware AMD E1-1200
Part of the Brazos 2.0 family, the AMD E1-1200 was introduced in 2012 as a power-efficient solution for entry-level laptops. It has 2 cores and 2 threads at 1.4 GHz, with no Turbo Core feature. Built with 40nm fabrication, this CPU has a TDP of 18W, which is still relatively efficient for low-power devices.
One of the key features of the E1-1200 is its integrated GPU, the AMD Radeon HD 7310, which offers better graphics performance than Intel's integrated solutions of the time. This GPU allows HD video playback and some light games at low settings.
Despite being power-efficient, the E1-1200's performance is quite limited. With a low clock speed and no Boost feature, it lacks responsiveness in multitasking and often experiences bottlenecks in modern applications.
Hardware Detail:
Device: HP 1000 1b05au
RAM: 4GB DDR3 Single Channel 2 DIMM
OS: Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 10
Wednesday, 26 December 2012 14:27:36 | Update: 1 week ago
About Hardware Intel Core i7 720QM
Released in 2009 as part of the Clarksfield (Nehalem) architecture, the Intel Core i7-720QM is a high-end mobile processor aimed at gaming laptops and workstations. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock speed of 1.6 GHz, which can increase to 2.8 GHz using Intel Turbo Boost.
With 45nm fabrication, this processor has a TDP of 45W, which is quite high for laptop standards. Because it uses Hyper-Threading, it can handle eight threads simultaneously, improving performance in multi-threaded applications such as video rendering and editing.
In terms of graphics, the i7-720QM does not have an integrated GPU, so laptops using it must have a discrete graphics card for display output.
Compared to modern processors, the i7-720QM's performance is quite behind, especially in power efficiency. However, for legacy systems still using this processor, its performance is still sufficient for basic tasks and some heavy applications with proper optimization.
Hardware Detail
Device: SAMSUNG 300E4Z
RAM: 4GB DDR3
OS: Windows 7
Tuesday, 19 July 2022 19:48:49 | Update: 1 week ago